#
To
lovers of literature, Warwickshire means not only Shakespeare but George Eliot,
one of the great wordsmiths of the 19th century. In her novel Adam Bede there is a beautiful tribute
to the Prayer Book that shaped and influenced her so profoundly in her youth as
a parishioner at Holy Trinity Church, Coventry.
Adam's thoughts of Hetty did not deafen
him to the service; they rather blended with all the other deep feelings for
which the church service was a channel to him this afternoon, as a certain
consciousness of our entire past and our imagined future blends itself with all
our moments of keen sensibility. And to Adam the church service was the best
channel he could have found for his mingled regret, yearning and resignation;
its interchange of beseeching cries for help, with outbursts of faith and
praise - its recurrent responses and the familiar rhythm of its collects,
seemed to speak for him as no other form of worship could have done.
As we
know, the contrast the author is drawing is between the excesses of nonconformist
‘enthusiasm’ as it was called at that time, and the more sober liturgy of the
established church. For myself, the contrast was not between one style of
worship and another, but between any worship and no worship at all. I first
attended a church service as a teenager. It was 1962, so I have my own
anniversary this year. It was evensong, Book of Common Prayer. I had hardly
stepped foot inside a church before. My parents had little time for religion.
But they did love music. To help me develop musically, I was drafted into one
of the best church choirs in London that sang to cathedral standard. No-one
took much notice of probationers in those days. I was left to make what sense
of it I could. All of it was utterly new to me. The canticles that evening were
sung to Walmisley in D minor. I have had a soft spot for that setting ever
since. I remember feeling awed and moved by what I was experiencing, this
tapestry of words and music that seemed to envelope me. It was strange, and yet
familiar, as if I had known it all along, but had not known that I knew, like
an old friend I had met for the first time. It was somehow familiar and
reassuring at the same time as it was unknown and new. I realised that in an
important way I had come home.
I come
to you from a cathedral that has a particular interest in the Prayer Book. In
our library we have a first edition of the 1549 Book of Common Prayer, and a
copy of the Sealed Book of 1662. But our closest connection is through the
great Bishop Cosin of Durham who was influential in shaping the 1662 book. The
University library has the wonderful Durham
Book, his personal copy of the 1559 Elizabethan revision of Cranmer’s two
prayer books, painstakingly, and lovingly, annotated with comments and
emendations in preparation for the next revision. Some of the best 1662
collects are written by him. And like all English cathedrals, ours is a place
where you know that Cranmer's
work retains an honoured place in the daily round of prayer.
There
is a paradox here. What for Cranmer was a bold experiment in creative
vernacular liturgy has become for us the traditional rite. So to honour the Prayer
Book is to recognise that that in the 16th century, this was a
radical break with tradition. By the 17thcentury this had changed,
not least because high church Anglicans like Bishop Cosin recognised Cranmer’s
debt to patristic and medieval rites, and how his intense focus on the passion
and death of Christ was completely in the spirit of late medieval devotion.
Meanwhile, the new liturgies of today have enriched all our churches with fresh
insights by taking us more directly back to forms of worship that belonged to
the early Christian centuries. We can be glad that we are in the happy position
to do as Jesus says, and in our worship bring out of our treasures things old
and new.
The
Prayer Book is part of our cultural inheritance. It belongs to the legacy of
Christian England, like the arcades and monuments of our churches and
cathedrals, like the King James version of the Bible whose 400th
anniversary we celebrated last year, like the poetry of George Herbert and John
Donne, like Gibbons and Purcell, like
Anglican chant and Hymns Ancient and
Modern. Its measured 'rhythms and cadences' as we call them, its
unforgettable words and images, its gravity and quiet joy, its undulating
landcsapes of contrition and praise, its sense of balance and proportion, these
all create a whole that is infinitely greater than the
parts. It is something of a miracle, unique to the English speaking world. We
are right to cherish it.
But the
Prayer Book is more than a treasured part of our heritage. Beauty can remain
merely an aesthetic experience, or it can lead us into a more inward place
where we find God. For example, the office of evensong speaks at many different
levels. It begins by marking the ending of the day: we go to sleep with the
memory of having prayed ‘defend us from all perils and dangers of this night’.
But that phrase seems to suggest deeper darknesses that need lightening in
whatever ordeals we may be going through: sickness, bereavement, sorrow,
fearfulness, shame. And then we are led further to reflect on the ultimate
sleep that awaits us all, death itself. ‘Lord, now lettest thou thy servant
depart in peace.’ Each Nunc Dimittis we sing or recite is one less until
eternity. That thought haunts you, but it gives you courage you as well, for it
helps you face your own mortality.
I am
saying that the Prayer Book is a rich manual of ‘soul-making’ as John Keats
called it. It trains us to become what we will all one day be in heaven:
contemplatives. Like the Rule of St Benedict, it offers a school where disciples
can be trained for eternal life. By inculcating the virtue of stability, it
exercises an enduring pastoral, formative influence on all who take it to their
hearts. For we are what we pray, as the old Latin tag has it: lex orandi lex credendi, what you pray
is what you believe. The words we say, the texts we sing in worship shape us,
whether we like it or not. And in the case of the Prayer Book, the fact that
these words are so imbued not only with biblical texts but also with the
Bible’s imagery and symbolism is part of what makes it somehow familiar. These
words matter. Their repetition when we truly mean them from the heart has a
healing, redemptive effect on us. How many times have we prayed the confession
at communion, and found that the burden of our sins is indeed intolerable
because we have been made to say those tough words and think about their
meaning? Or discovered the release that comes when we hear the comfortable
words read and are then summoned to lift up our hearts? To be caught up in spiritual
dynamics of the Prayer Book is, I think, to experience a kind of catharsis of
the soul, a purifying that leads to a more serious sense of purpose in being
Christians, and therefore, better human beings.
Finally,
this purifying of spiritual motive and intent is a consequence of being
required by the Prayer Book to pay attention and listen. Many texts are to be spoken by the priest alone, addressing
the congregation or God on our behalf. Take the Prayer of Humble Access. Why
does the rubric require the priest to say it on behalf of the worshippers
rather than by the congregation itself? Perhaps because here, at this solemn
moment in the rite, the text wants us not to be busy with our heads in our
books worrying about written words. Instead it invites us to approach the
sacrament in a more contemplative way, allowing this great prayer to draw our
thoughts and meditations towards the gift of God in the body and blood of our
Saviour Jesus Christ. It is wrong to say that we do not ‘join in’ just because we
are silent: on the contrary, we ‘join in’ in a more demanding way: by listening
and praying while others perform the liturgy on our behalf. Its carefully
calibrated pace slows us down, makes us go deep, something that we need in a
world that is often fast and shallow. We learn that liturgy must never be manic
and busy. It must make us sit at the feet of Jesus.
To Adam
Bede, the Prayer Book service ‘spoke for him as no other form of service could
have done’. In the Letter to the Hebrews the author reminds his readers to ‘remember
your leaders, those who spoke the word of God to you’. Today we celebrate the
1662 Prayer Book and the leaders who had a part in creating it during the 16th
and 17thcenturies. Their labour of love continues to speak the word
of God to us today and to testify to Christ who is the same yesterday, today
and for ever.
To
him, crucified and risen, be all praise and honour today and all our days, and
to eternity.
Hampton
Lucy, 12 May 2012
(Hebrews
13)
No comments:
Post a Comment